I asked my 8th grade U.S. History students to act as “detectives” and examine primary sources from the Boston Massacre to answer the central question: “Who started the Boston Massacre?” I gave my students diverse sources from different points-of-view because I wanted to challenge them to use their “detective” historical thinking skills. But I noticed that they kept seeking the “correct” answer in class, even though history does not always have a “correct” answer. That dichotomous way of thinking–right versus wrong–is not useful for historical inquiry. I wanted my students to feel comfortable with the unknown and use historical analytical skills to come to an answer. Instead, while comparing two documents, they looked to me for the answer. One student said, “I think the difference is that this text was written a few years later. Is that what you want us to notice?” I didn’t know how to respond because that was actually a key point I wanted them to notice, but I didn’t want them to look to me for approval.
-
Josh
8th Grade
US History
First Year Teaching
Unpack This Teacher’s Dilemma
- What is the teacher's dilemma? Consider the teacher's goals, possible actions, beliefs about the situation and the students, and their own self-perceptions.
- Complete or modify the following sentence in a way that captures the teacher's central tension in the situation: "While on the one hand, the teacher believed/wanted/felt/did , on the other hand, they believed/wanted/felt/did ."
Unpack Your Own Dilemma
- Thinking about your own classroom, how do you balance your desire for interpretations that lean into the ambiguity of historical inquiry and students’ desire to find the one “right” answer?
- As you navigate similar dilemmas, what are your goals, beliefs, self-perceptions and the possible actions you can take?